ROTOR 4624 BB 386 Evo bottom bracket road BB386EVO

Show all items from ROTOR
  • Caution:
    The images above are symbolic in nature and may differ from the actually delivered goods respectively the delivery inclusion might differ.
    Hence we please you to carefully read the item name and the item description. Just drop us a short mail in case that you have questions though.
  • 4624 BB386 Evo

    Picture shows the 4624 BBRight!

    The 386 EVO is a version of the PF30 system. The frame shell width is nominally 87mm. The inside diameter is 46mm, similar to the PF30. The pressed bearings are the same as PF30 bearings, but the crank must have a longer spindle compatible with a 386 EVO bottom bracket frame shell.

    For Road frames with 386Evo BB standard and 24mm spindle!

    386 Evo

    ROTOR - BB & Spacers
  • Rate this product

    •  
    • Unfortunately, there isn't any review yet. Be the first one and share your experiences with thousands of other riders!
  • Why Q-rings?
    Biomechanical studies indicate that the effort made with Q-Rings becomes a greater performance and pedaling feeling more rounded and smooth due to their ability to make a better use of the strongest muscle groups while they also compensate the dead spot in pedaling.
    Q-Ring-Round Ring Comparison
    Far from feeling unusual, a Q-Ring feels much rounder than a round ring. A spinscan analysis visualize a cyclists power delivery, with a bar graph indicating the variation from maximum to minimum output and a polar graph showing the rotating shape of the power profile.

    By comparing the left hand Round chainring spinscan and the right hand Q-Ring spinscan below, one can see that Q-Ring graphs are clearly smoother (less variation in torque in the bar graph) and fuller (less of a peanut shape at the weakest point).
    Spinscan
    When one projects a polar plot of a typical spinscan over the varying drivetrain resistance of a 53t Q-Ring during its rotation, the value of a Q-Ring is clearly visible: Maximum power is met with a “56,5t” Time trial sized chainring diameter and minimum power is met with a “50,4” compact size chainring diameter.
    This variation creates the “perfect spin” we all aspire to, that simply isn’t possible with round chainrings. This is because Q-Rings compensate for the weakest zone of the pedalling stroke and maximize use of the most powerful zone.
    Key benefits (based on ROTOR study)
    • All Q-ring TT’s were faster, with an average gain of 1.6 sec and 0.7 km/h (1.8%).
    • All Q-Ring TT’s generated more power, with average increase of 26.7 W (6.2%)
    • Reduced oxygen consumption and heart rate in submaximal tests
    • An immediate performance increase on switching from round rings to Q-Rings
    • An immediate performance reduction on switching back to round chainrings
    • It also appears that the more effort a cyclist exerts, the greater the benefit of Q’s

    Please see this article for more detailed information.
  • Attachements
    Front derailleur adjustmentsinstruction manual
    517.09 KB
    Which bottom bracket do I need?instruction manual
    894.62 KB
    Which bottom bracket do I need?instruction manual
    894.62 KB
    Q-Ring adaption guide / Starting with Q-Ringsinstruction manual
    194.47 KB
    Q-Ring adaption guide / Starting with Q-Ringsinstruction manual
    108.76 KB
  • Customers who viewed this also viewed:
Problem free shipping to U.S.A.
Unproblematic customs clearance
You are here:
This item is crafted in Spain